We’re a community group concerned with understanding the many dimensions of climate change, located 120km SE of Melbourne. We meet at San Remo pub, at 7.30PM on alternate Tuesdays, everybody welcome. Please click Climate Emergency Petition to help make climate a big election issue.
The gas in Santos’s Barossa field contains approximately 18% carbon dioxide (CO2), a high concentration that requires separation before it can be piped to the Darwin LNG facility for processing. This high CO2 content makes the project one of the most carbon-intensive gas developments in the world, and a portion of this separated CO2 is vented into the atmosphere as part of the extraction process.
Why the CO2 needs to be separated
Pipelining:The CO2 must be removed to allow the remaining gas to be pipelined onshore to the Darwin LNG facility.
Product Specification:The CO2 must be removed to meet the product specifications for natural gas.
The impact of the high CO2 content
Atmospheric Emissions:The significant volume of CO2 removed from the Barossa gas is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, with a portion being vented into the atmosphere.
Carbon Intensity:The high CO2 concentration makes the Barossa project significantly more carbon-intensive than other gas projects in Australia.
Regulatory Scrutiny:The high CO2 content is a key factor in the project’s interaction with Australia’s Safeguard Mechanism policy.
Typical energy stored in LNG is 50MJ/kg. MJ is useful unit of measure for energy in short durations, seconds or less. For something we can relate to, it makes more sense to convert to kWh, the units of energy we see on our electricity bills. Result is 180 kWh/kg. This doesn’t allow for energy used to facilities at ports to load and unload at source and destination, regasify LNG or inefficiency when used to make heat on stove top or space heater, relatively inefficient appliances. All electric homes typically use less than 10kWh per day but 360kWh consumed before you feel the warmth.
It’s probably generous to guess less than 10% efficiency,which means just 1/10th of energy if gas was burnt at well head travels as far as conversion to heat at your space heater. Or 360 in for 18 keeping you warm!!
Such inefficiency is why our governments are offering incentive payments to change to All Electrichomes, using so much less energy at so many fewer $.
To keep LNG liquid while travelling on a ship, insulation isn’t perfect. So it needs shots of cooling. How? With BOG, boil off gas, going where? To ship engines or atmosphere. Gas might be as bad as coal, if not cycled through LNG, obviously worse with inefficiency of LNG.
And Trumpelstiltskin just commanded EU to buy $750Billion of LNG from USA.
In other countries public pressure has been enough to make advertising of gas and other fossil fuels illegal. This improves human health as well as budget health, reducing cost of living in economic hard times. You might like to add “no ads” in letters to your politicians.
It takes a lot of energy to chill methane/CO2 mix down to – 162degC then allow CO2 to boil off as waste. Industry dominated by few large players means they’re shy about divulging performance figures. Efficiency depends on purity of methane, removing CO2, other flammable gases, grit and acidic vapours which could freeze and cause failure. Persevering, they suggest looking at energy stored in LNG instead of energy to make it.
Earlier major partner for this “vast” gas field was Exxon Mobil but they sold concerned about cost to their “social licence”(reduced sales at servos, unpopularity
——————————————
The East Natuna gas field has approximately 71%CO2 content in its natural gas, a high concentration that made early development efforts expensive and difficult due to extraction costs and the need for extensive CO2 removal. The significant CO2 content of the East Natuna field presented a major challenge, as separating the valuable methane from the large volume of carbon dioxide is a complex and costly industrial process.
Details on East Natuna’s CO2 Content
High CO2 Percentage:The East Natuna gas field, located in Indonesia’s Natuna Sea, is known for its massive size and a very high concentration of CO2, estimated to be around 71% of the total gas in place.
Development Challenges:This high CO2 percentage significantly increased the cost of extracting and processing the gas, making it difficult to develop the field economically.
Cryogenic Separation:Techniques like cryogenic distillation are used to separate CO2 from the other components of natural gas, including the valuable methane.
Why this matters
Resource Utilization:Overcoming the CO2 challenge is crucial for utilizing the vast gas reserves in the East Natuna field.
Industrial Processes:The separation of CO2 from natural gas involves complex industrial processes, such as cryogenic distillation, where the mixture of gases is cooled to extremely low temperatures to separate them.
Alternative Applications:If the extracted CO2 is not used for methane production, it could potentially be used for applications like enhanced oil recovery (EOR) or for long-term storage (sequestration) as part of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects.
Richie Merzian, the CEO of the Clean Energy Investor Group, says a firm timeline for coal retirement is something the CEIG is pushing for, too, particularly in the wake of the latest power station extensions in Queensland.
“We want to see locked-in coal-fired plant shut-down dates,” Merzian told the panel discussion.
“We actually need a firmed energy strategy to set out what is the actual mix of firmed energy we need to complement the rollout of renewables.
French-government owned EdF, whose former CEO had originally promised in 2007 that the Hinkley project would be “cooking Christmas turkeys” in England by 2017, at a cost of just £9 billion.
EdF has already had to be bailed out by its own government, and ultimately nationalised, because of the cost blowouts and the huge costs of buying replacement power when half its French nuclear fleet went offline in 2023.
The new start-up date is now for 2030, but more likely 2031 – and that is only for one of the two units!!
China’s CGN had to be brought in to fund one third of the Hinckley project, but is refusing to contribute more funds because China has been frozen out of other UK projects!!
while Hinkley’s construction costs are in the £42 to £48 billion range, its first 35 years of electricity at £87.50 or £92.50/MW in 2012 money, adjusted for inflation, will cost UK energy users a gargantuan £111 or £116 billion, or up to $A223 billion.
Story above is for those of us who are unable to keep track of huge blow outs, in cost and time, for latest nuke in UK. Please note that for construction cost of AUD92 B, they get only 1 of 2 proposed units rated at 1.6GW only 70% of output from Loy Yang.
— Read on reneweconomy.com.au/cost-of-uks-flagship-nuclear-project-blows-out-to-more-than-a92-billion/amp/