Scientific proof that Exxon and the Kochs distorted public’s understanding of Climate Change

When it comes to climate deniers in the halls of Congress, some have suggested that their rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change stems from their financial ties to the fossil fuel industry.

But it turns out that it’s not just members of Congress whose climate doubt may be traced back to corporate influence — a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests that over the last 20 years, private funding has had an important influence on the overall polarization of climate change as a topic in the United States.

“The main thesis that corporate funding influences climate change issues is definitely something people have been writing about for a long time, but just not with the type of data to fully support these conclusions,” Justin Farrell, author of the study and a sociologist at Yale University, told ThinkProgress. “It confirms what we thought using comprehensive data and computational analyses.”

To understand how corporate funding has contributed to the polarization of climate change in the United States, Farrell looked at 20 years’ worth of data, analyzing articles, texts, and policy papers produced by 164 organizations and more than 4,500 individuals who do not accept the science of climate change (that climate change is either not happening or not a product of human activity). The study also looked at funding from two key contrarian entities: the Koch Family Foundationsand ExxonMobil.

By analyzing both the networks of individuals and organizations that have participated in climate misinformation campaigns and the climate-related texts that those organizations produced between 1993 and 2013, Farrell found what he described to the Washington Post as an “ecosystem of influence” within groups that received corporate funding. Groups that received funding from Koch or Exxon were not only more likely to have written texts aimed at polarizing climate change, but were more likely to change the emphasis of their content over time. Beginning in 2008, groups that received funding were more likely than unfunded groups to produce texts stressing things like the idea that climate change is a long term cycle or that carbon dioxide is in fact good for the planet, key tenets of the climate misinformation campaign aimed at casting doubt on the scientific consensus. Groups that received funding consistently touted these themes, while groups with no funding didn’t show the same level of coordination.

“This funding has an impact on the nature and amount of what is going out in the climate misinformation effort,” Robert Brulle, a professor of sociology and environmental science at Drexel University who was not involved in the study, told ThinkProgress. “It’s stronger, and there’s more of it, and these organizations are at the core of the effort.”

The study comes out at a time when ExxonMobil is facing increasing public scrutiny for its role in misleading the public about climate change. Several prominent politicians have called for a Department of Justice investigation into whether or not Exxon purposefully mislead the public about climate change, based on information published in a recent Inside Climate News investigation which found that Exxon’s internal research confirmed in 1977 that climate change is caused by carbon emissions from fossil fuels. Earlier this month, New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman issued a subpoena to Exxon, demanding records relating to its climate research.

“[The study] gives credence and empirical strength to the argument that ExxonMobil made a concerted effort to promulgate climate misinformation, which they knew from their internal research was false,” Brulle said.

But beyond Exxon, Brulle praised the paper for proving with data something that climate activists have long suspected: When it comes to climate misinformation, corporate funding plays a crucial role.

“We sort of always suspected that this was the case, that the funders were building and creating this effort, but this really demonstrates it empirically,” he said. “This is a very, very robust and interesting paper.”

>original> ThinkProgress

Posted in Events local | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Detail about plight of Great Barrier Reef

Interview: Queensland Minister for Environment and Heritage Protection, and Minister for National Parks and the Great Barrier Reef – impressive analysis that main problem is turbidity, inspecting 6 year old trial sites, with 6 different treatments, identifying that, as soon as surface turf is broken by cattle, below, there’s big depth of very fine sediment soil, eroded away by heavy rain. Lab test shows density and long life turbidity. Of course, Greg Hunt has always said that problems for reef are neither sea level rise, nor warming, nor acidity but run off from farming. His plan has ben to reduce run-off of fertiliser, herbicide and pesticide, disregarding that scientists, from Barrow Island WA to Cooktown have been trying to persuade him that turbidity is the culprit. Since corals are strange mix of plant and animal, blocking of sunlight stops plant side photosynthesis and blocking of micro food entries starves animal side. Regardless, you can be sure that Greg is “absolutely confident…” that his plan will deliver, to save us from “Critical/Endangered Status” pending with UNESCO.

>video> Lateline ABC1 TV

Posted in Events local | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Fearsome collapse of World’s forests

FYI6958578-3x2-340x227 scary set of numbers

Reese Halter: Planet Earth’s forests are breathtaking. Did you know that ancient trees are the greatest carbon warehouses to have ever evolved? For every metric tonne of ancient wood created, 1.5 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide was removed from the atmosphere, and one metric tonne of oxygen was released. Frighteningly, Earth’s forests are dying on every forested continent, from warming temperatures and associated insect infestations, prolonged heatwaves, intense wildfires, and vicious droughts.

It’s crucial to understand why we as a species want to stay away from crossing the two-degrees Celsius threshold because thereafter, according to a 2009 International Union of Forest Research Report, if Earth passes the 2.5-degrees Celsius temperature threshold above preindustrial times, forests globally could lose their entire carbon storage capacity. In other words, instead of removing and storing carbon, they would release all their stored carbon. The result of crossing that threshold would be an uninhabitable world for civilisation as we know it.

safe_image.phpAlready across parts of western North America that have heated up above 1.5 degrees Celsius, the ominous tell-tales vividly reveal the outcome; mass death of mountain forests. When nature’s cold blanket was removed, populations of indigenous bark beetles exploded into the trillions. There are at least 30 billion dead pines and spruce from Alaska and the Yukon extending thousands of kilometres into Mexico and west into California, and everywhere in between. Those forests were vital as living snow forests, slowly releasing water in the springtime via trillions of tree roots, sustaining 50 million people across western North America, including California and the eighth largest economy on the globe.

In Australia, ancient trees are dying too. In Western Australia the iconic tuart, wandoo, flooded gum, marri and WA peppermints have begun dying from extreme heat waves and prolonged droughts. Near Perth, over 16,000 hectares of jarrah forests have collapsed, 10 times greater than previously recorded death rates. The knock-on effect, in 2010 and 2011 the Carnaby black cockatoo population in the greater Perth area crashed by 34%. No big trees, no food equals death.

In Tasmania, extreme heat in the north in 2012 and 2013 resulted in white and blue gums cooking to death. My colleagues dubbed it the ginger syndrome from the blood-like discolouring of the oozing bark. The Cooma-Monaro region of New South Wales also shows the eerie death of an entire iconic landscape of eucalyptus, an area almost 2,000 square kilometres.

Rising greenhouse gases from burning climate altering fossil fuels have begun to destroy the Amazon rainforest with vengeance. In 2005, 1.9 million square kilometres experienced intense drought and winds that blew down half a billion mature trees. Later that year, a one-in-100-year drought event prevented trees from absorbing 1.5 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide. And, as the dead, blown-down trees decomposed, they released 5 billion metric tonnes of greenhouse gases.

In 2007, an extreme drought in southeast Amazonia created epic wildfires, 10 times more than the average, an area equivalent to burning 1 million World Cup Brazilian soccer fields. In 2010, a subcontinental drought enveloped 3.5 million square kilometres of the Amazon Basin, a gigantic swathe of mature forest died and released 8 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide, or what the United States spends in a year.

Not only has the Amazon lost billions of oxygen producing mature trees since 2005, but also their phenomenal ability to make daily rain clouds, regulating the water cycle, providing massive afternoon white cloud surfaces, reflecting incoming solar radiation, ameliorating Earth’s temperatures. Instead, solar radiation penetrates denuded forest floors all day long, heating them and in turn heating our atmosphere.

The climate delegates in Bonn Germany and later this month in Paris at the climate talks must understand that a global 25% greenhouse gas reduction by 2020, then a 40% reduction by 2030, followed by a complete phasing out of fossil fuels by 2050 won’t prevent more wild weather. But it might ensure that our civilisation, with 9 billion people, can survive to mid-century.

For The Science Show, I’m Dr Reese Halter in Los Angeles, California.

Robyn Williams: And I think he means it.

>from> Science Show ABC RN

Posted in Events local | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Report All Energy Expo

At Jeff’s Shed, Melbourne, 7 and 8 October, annual All Energy Expo and Conference was an outstanding event, big Expo so many new products, especially battery storage systems, to save, not export, daytime excess solar PV, to use it after dark, so you don’t buy power from grid. Conference side was excellent, 5 simultaneous streams of presentations, about energy systems, small as well as large, products, possibilities, politics and prospects.
Final VIP speaker, on day one, was Right Affable Minister for Environment Greg Hunt, with all kinds of good news, like new Office for Climate Change and Renewable Energy Innovation. His activity in previous days included visiting CEFC and ARENA, offering assurance that no plans to cancel them.
Greg was complimentary about every aspect of Expo. In conflict with track record, supporting big grid power, he says he anticipates big exodus from big grid electricity, especially if big operators don’t get with new opportunities, investing in DE(distributed energy), especially with storage and reducing prices.
Specifically, Greg reminded us about surplus capacity, as much as 30%. So some generators need to quit, reassuring us, surprisingly, that government will not be offering any taxpayer cash golden handshakes.
Obviously, emission reduction target, before UNFCCC in Paris in December, for both 2020 and promise for 2030 is important. Greg says “we can now do this easily, no need to do anything”. He went on to explain that because of reduced demand, the 5% target is less. Additionally, during RET was review, he removed amount of energy consumed by EITE(emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industries). These are biggest consumers, like aluminium smelters, cement, steel. But, does ignoring their emissions, really reduce our liability?
About promise for 2030, Greg pitches ownership of 26 to 28% as his own initiative. Next breath he’s comparing with rest of world, especially USA. Coincidentally, their promise is also 26 to 28%. Yet Greg advises our 26 to 28% will actually be 50% bigger reduction, per capita. How can this be? Without any explanation from Greg, it can only be that Australian emissions, per capita, right now, are 50% bigger than USA. If we both reduce by the same % then both before and after, our emissions reduction is 50% more than USA. But our emissions remain 50% higher. Smoke and mirror trickery here.
Greg was very upbeat, repeating “absolute confidence…” and “rock solid, rock solid…” on each topic. It’s not known if Greg was aware that morning keynote international speaker speaker was Lord Deben, Thatcher era, long serving Conservative government, Secretary of State for Environment, with NGO community calling him “the best Environment Secretary we ever had”. Notable mention is, in UK, he says they cringe in anticipation of any climate change news from Australia, our country, with most bountiful supply of solar and wind resources, along with excellent track record developing science and technology, cringing because of consistently stupid policies of our politicians, like ERF, completely sold out to coal, oil and gas corporations.
Here’s hoping PM Turnbull will actually revive clean energy industry. Actual chance of stopping warming under 2degC is already long gone.
Posted in Events local | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Melbourne losing status as biggest container port

In our backyard, still haunted by possible mega development container Port of Hastings, looks like less to worry about. Port of Botany has not only caught up but rail link is in place to provide for loading directly to/from ships to rail transport to outer south west intermodal depot for distribution. This means huge savings and efficiency in eliminating  slow load/unload to ever more expensive, with polluting, slow traffic transit trucks. Heavy loads from western district farmers are already using rail to Port Botany, to lock in to lower port fees, worried about expected doubling of fees if Port of Melbourne is privatised. At presentation for Port of Hastings in Cowes, even CEO said Hastings would not be a goer without rail link. So why is Labor government proposing Western Distributor, hugely expensive road, donating 15 years more tolls to Citylink tax dodgers? Even crazier proposed privatisation of Port of Melbourne, is expected to double container handling fees. Why sell off such a valuable asset, to finance replacement of suburban rail crossings, when interest rates for government are lowest ever?

>more> The Age

Posted in Events local | Leave a comment

Climate message on stage

6958528-3x2-340x227“2071 The world we’ll leave our grand children”(CHRIS RAPLEY, ROYAL COURT THEATRE) – Well respected climate scientist connects with theatre people to create new type of event, to communicates with new audience, with interest in climate change not previously engaged. Incidental gem is review of risk. Expecting to limit global warming to less than 2degC by keeping CO2 levels to less than 450ppm is not certain. It’s as feeble as 2 out of 3 chance. Evidently, when proposing new projects, these days, as well as usual financial and even environmental analysis, in UK it’s necessary to identify any risk with less than 1 in 200 chance. Curiously 1 in 200 is current risk of exceeding 8degC warming. How can we let our leaders take such crazy risk of extinction and extreme cost to these and future generations?safe_image.php

>more> ScienceShow ABC RN

 

 

Posted in Events local | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

New evaluation how much damage to/danger from, world forests

Greg Hunt insists that forest tree planting is his most effective means of “reducing emissions”. Of course, he actually means “offset”, trees absorbing CO2, while avoiding action to reduce emissions by power stations. Ever increasing heat and drought now lead to desiccation of huge areas of native forest, tinder dry ready for more and bigger fires. How long can we let Greg Hunt get away with nonsense about not reducing emissions? He also says he wants to reforest developing countries, as long as he receives and they don’t get value of carbon reduction certificates. But didn’t John Howard do this, for $100M of taxpayers money, to Indonesia, disappeared without trace. Is it time for us to make sure they know proposals like this are looking shonky?

>more>Science Show ABC RN

Posted in Events local | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Australia ranks 110 in world for renewables development, energy efficiency

So much potential, always, but sliding further down slippery slope, to ever bigger cost of recovery, while credit rating shrinks.

>more> RenewEconomy

Posted in Events local | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Navigating Victoria’s Energy Future – free seminar

1511VicEneFuture

The Victorian Government will soon unveil its Renewable Energy Action Plan, aimed at accelerating the development of renewable energy in Victoria. The plan will outline policy measures designed to attract renewable energy investment and to create new jobs in Victoria…This seminar – Wednesday, 18 November 2015 from 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM – U of M – will bring together government, academia, industry and the broader community to explore the opportunities and challenges in navigating a cleaner energy future for Victoria.

Let’s as many of us as possible get behind our leaders, time to make up for lost Tony time.

>more> EventBrite

Posted in Events local | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Australia’s first community owned retailer awarded licence

enova meetEnova Energy has become the first Australia’s first community-owned energy retailer to gain a licence to sell electricity to consumers, in what could become the first i
mportant step to a complete re-design of the energy market.
..The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) approved Enova’s application for a retail licence on Friday, subject to completion of Enova’s current capital raising by late November. Enova is seeking for raise $3 million, and is half way to that target.

If you’re not familiar with concept of CORE(Community Owned Renewable Energy) it’s very much like the favourable terms and improved security you get with not-for-profit credit union, rather than rip-off by big banks. These things are all about trust and have worked for centuries.

>more> OneStepOffTheGrid

Posted in Events local | Tagged , , | Leave a comment