So much concrete is poured for a new nuclear station that it adds to climate change before construction is complete. By the time any reactors financed by this scheme are up and running, the battle to avoid the atmosphere overheating could well be lost, according to scientists. A similar idea was tried in the US – getting consumers to pay up front for two nuclear power reactors in South Carolina – but it was abandoned when $9bn had already been spent.
de-carbonise, zero carbon, global warming, climate change, renewable energy, phillip island, bass coast
-
Recent Posts
- Doubts hydrogen
- Sussan ley spelling: Numerology behind second ‘s’ in Minister’s name
- Chevron concedes CCS failures at Gorgon, seeks deal with WA regulators | RenewEconomy
- Guest post: Mapping ‘blue-carbon wealth’ around the world
- Europe’s Carbon Capture pipeline: 40+ projects. But where’s the policy support and market creation? – Energy Post
Archives
Blogroll
Twits
- What a missed opportunity? Why doesn’t she insist that Dan should be holding a hose? twitter.com/simonahac/stat… 7 hours ago
SkS
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweets
