Energy/buildings – Gas not the answer 1

Here’s a surprising analysis of energy efficiency, about space heating(also cooling) by Matthew Wright from BZE.

In Shire of Bass Coast, folks on the mainland now have natural gas. On Phillip Island, it’s deemed “too expensive” for the pipeline. Wherever we are, we’ve been bombarded, from Canberra, by publicity that “gas is clean(or cleaner)” and “more efficient”.

Compared with electric element type radiator heating, gas may well be cleaner and cheaper. But gas into your house needs to be just burnt before it makes any heat. Obviously a lot of thermal energy(up to 70%) is lost up the flue.

Compared with up to date, inverter, reverse cycle, split system air conditioner gas doesn’t compete. Electricity used to be “burnt” by old fashioned electric element heaters. But aircon heat pump principle just moves heat, between outside and inside, which means you get as much as 5 to 6 times more heat transfer, compared with “burn” of raw energy. This is based on recent technology inverter systems, with automatic controllers sensibly set to only heat up to 18degC and cool down to 24degC. You can obviously still break the bank, during heat wave, if “somebody” overrides setting for 15degC, not a cool thing to do.


About groundswellbasscoast

This is on behalf of local climate change group. Material is selected by Bernie McComb and does not necessarily represent opinion of whole group.
This entry was posted in Solutions. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s